Polkadot’s unique design allows it to offer some advantages over Ethereum. For one, Polkadot can theoretically process around 1,000 transactions per second (tps), compared to Ethereum’s current maximum of around 15 tps.
This scalability is due to Polkadot’s sharding design, which splits the network into multiple shards that can process transactions in parallel. This is in contrast to Ethereum’s more linear design, which can only process transactions one at a time.
Additionally, Polkadot has a built-in governance mechanism that allows stakeholders to vote on proposed changes to the network. This not only makes Polkadot more flexible and adaptable than Ethereum, but also provides a way for the community to come to consensus on contentious issues.
Finally, Polkadot is designed to be more modular than Ethereum, meaning that different components can be swapped out and replaced more easily. This makes it easier for developers to build on Polkadot and could lead to more innovation in the long run.
Overall, Polkadot’s design gives it some clear advantages over Ethereum. Whether or not these advantages will be enough to make Polkadot the leading platform for decentralized applications remains to be seen.